Regressive judgment: implications of a universal property of the empirical world. in Social Judgment and Decision Making 171–189 (Psychology Press, 2012).įiedler, K. More than an artifact: regression as a theoretical construct. Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks. False consensus and false uniqueness in estimating the prevalence of health-protective behaviors. Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. Gender disparities in science? Dropout, productivity, collaborations and success of male and female computer scientists. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Intuitive judgments of social statistics: how exhaustive does sampling need to be? J. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. The false consensus effect in estimates of smoking prevalence: underlying mechanisms. Estimates of social consensus by majorities and minorities: the case for social projection. The ‘majority illusion’ in social networks. Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Pluralistic ignorance: when similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: fear and estimates of social consensus. In-group-out-group differences in social projection. From social projection to social behaviour. The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. The false consensus effect: a meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. The ‘false consensus effect’: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Public beliefs about the beliefs of the public. Journalists and Trump voters live in separate online bubbles. The false consensus effect: predicting adolescents’ tobacco use from normative expectations. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. in The Handbook of Social Psychology (eds. Social influence: social norms, conformity and compliance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |